Creator of the Perinatal Inner Readiness Profile and the RAD framework. The person who named Reproductive Anxiety Disorder.
Screening for tokophobia sounds like it should be simple: use a fear-of-childbirth questionnaire and read the score. In practice it is harder than that, because the tools we have were built for one narrow situation, and reproductive fear is far wider than that situation allows. Here is how to think about screening so you actually catch it.
Why standard screening misses so much
The established measures of fear of childbirth, the kind developed in academic and midwifery settings, are genuinely useful for what they were designed to do: assess fear in women who are pregnant. But that is also their limit. They are built around pregnancy, so they tend to be administered to women who are already pregnant and already in the system.
That leaves an enormous gap. The women whose fear is most life-shaping are often the ones who never get pregnant, who avoid the clinic, who would never be handed a childbirth-fear questionnaire in the first place. A tool that only measures fear once a woman is pregnant cannot see the woman who is too afraid to get there. So if your screening depends entirely on those instruments, you will keep missing exactly the people who most need finding.
Screen for the wider pattern, not just the pregnancy moment
The shift that helps is to screen for the broader pattern of reproductive fear, what I call Reproductive Anxiety Disorder, rather than only for fear of an imminent birth. That means paying attention across your whole caseload, not just with pregnant clients: the avoidance, the control, the too-neat narratives, the relationships that never last, the meticulous contraception. Recognition and screening go hand in hand, and the indirect signs are covered in how to recognise tokophobia in your clients.
It also means being willing to ask directly and read the response, because a woman’s reaction to a simple question about pregnancy or birth often reveals more than a numerical score.
A tool built for the whole picture
This is the gap I built the Perinatal Inner Readiness Profile to fill. Rather than measuring fear of an approaching birth alone, it assesses what a woman is carrying around pregnancy, birth and motherhood more broadly, grounded in the RAD framework. It works whether or not she is pregnant, and it is not an intake-only instrument, it is just as useful partway through a piece of work, or at the end, to show how far someone has moved.
Practically, a client completes it and you can see quickly where the focus needs to be, which matters, because these women are often on a timeline and do not have the luxury of a slow unfolding. I cover how practitioners use it in using the PIRP with perinatal clients, and the free Introduction to Tokophobia webinar sets the wider context.
Frequently asked questions
How do you screen for tokophobia?
Screen for the wider pattern of reproductive fear across your whole caseload, not just for fear of an imminent birth in pregnant clients. Watch for the indirect signs, ask directly about feelings toward pregnancy and birth and read the response, and use a structured assessment that works whether or not the woman is pregnant.
Why do standard fear-of-childbirth questionnaires miss cases?
Because they were designed to assess fear in women who are already pregnant. They are useful for that, but they miss the women whose fear keeps them from ever getting pregnant or near the clinic, often the most severe cases. A pregnancy-bound tool cannot see the woman too afraid to get there.
Can you screen for tokophobia in women who are not pregnant?
Yes, and you should, because that is where much of the most serious fear sits. It requires looking at the broader pattern of reproductive anxiety rather than fear of an approaching birth, and using an assessment built for that wider picture rather than one designed only for pregnancy.
About the author: Alexia Leachman trains and equips perinatal professionals to recognise and support tokophobia and Reproductive Anxiety Disorder, and built the Perinatal Inner Readiness Profile as a practical assessment for this work. More about Alexia →
This is professional education, not clinical supervision, and does not replace your own training or scope of practice.
Read next: